Faith Leaders Speak Out Against Proposition 314, Call It a Threat to Human Dignity

Arizona faith leaders are uniting in opposition to Proposition 314, a measure on the state’s 2024 ballot that they say threatens the rights and dignity of vulnerable communities. The proposition, which has been presented as a border security solution, has raised concerns among religious leaders from various traditions, who argue that its provisions are unjust and harmful, particularly to Black, Brown, Indigenous, and immigrant populations.

“We hope to educate our community about the dangers of bad policies like Prop 314,” said Rev. Sarah Oglesby-Dunegan, a leader in the Unitarian Universalist faith. “Our values call us to work for justice and equity, and Prop 314 undermines the principle of human dignity that is central to both legal and ethical standards of our faith.”

Proposition 314 would increase local enforcement of immigration laws, a move critics argue will lead to racial profiling and family separation. This concern has drawn parallels to SB 1070, the controversial "Show Me Your Papers" law passed in Arizona 14 years ago, which also faced widespread condemnation from faith and community leaders.

Alicia Contreras-Alas, Executive Director of Corazón, a community organization working with Arizona’s immigrant and minority populations, compared the current fight to that earlier struggle. “We stood together against SB 1070, and now we must stand together against Prop 314. It does nothing to improve our immigration system—it’s dangerous, unconstitutional, and will subject our communities to harassment and profiling,” she said.

Faith leaders have emphasized the moral and religious obligations that drive their opposition. Many point to sacred texts and teachings that emphasize treating migrants and vulnerable individuals with respect, care, and empathy. Talley, another faith leader involved in the effort, said, “The Bible instructs us to treat migrants with love and kindness because we are all created in the image of God. By that truth, everyone deserves dignity, value, and respect.”

Religious groups argue that Proposition 314 could create fear within Arizona communities, particularly among those of mixed immigration status. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) expressed concern that such fear could prevent people from accessing critical services like SNAP and other benefits, as they may avoid seeking assistance to prevent interactions with law enforcement.

The opposition to Proposition 314 highlights concerns not just about the potential legal consequences of the measure but also its broader impact on the moral fabric of Arizona communities. Critics say it could undermine federal immigration laws, raise due process concerns, and disproportionately affect marginalized groups.

As Election Day approaches, faith leaders across Arizona are calling on voters to carefully consider the moral implications of Proposition 314. “We carry a deep responsibility as faithful Arizonans to reject this harmful proposition,” said Contreras-Alas. “It is crucial that we come together to stand for justice and dignity for all.”

Erin Dooley

Erin Dooley (Lashley) serves as co-founder of BLK South. With over twenty years of experience in nonprofit leadership, pastoral ministry, and strategic communications, Erin has worked extensively in faith-based and community-driven initiatives. She has served as a Co-Pastor at Kaleo Phoenix Church, Clergy Engagement & Communications Manager at Corazón, and a brand strategist and content producer. Currently pursuing a Master of Community Leadership at Eden Theological Seminary (graduating spring 2026), she is a scholar in the making, passionate about the intersection of theology, human behavior, and social transformation. Erin’s work focuses on creating spaces that cultivate healing, belonging, and liberation, particularly for historically marginalized communities.

https://www.erinvlashley.com/podcast
Previous
Previous

Why Gathering with the Community During Election Season is More Crucial Than Ever

Next
Next

A Crossroads of Faith and Politics: Candidates Walk a Fine Line on Political Correctness